By now everyone has heard of President Obama saying that Christianity is no better than Islam at the National Prayer Breakfast on February 4th. I wasn't going to comment on this because there is nothing new here; everyone knows that our president is an apologist for Islam. But since the president's historical revisionism is common among deists and other Bible skeptics I know, I feel compelled to make a post setting the record straight.
Our president said that the Islamic State was “a brutal
vicious death cult that, in the name of religion, carries out unspeakable acts
of barbarism.” But he went on to say, “Lest we get on our high horse and think
that this is unique to some other place, remember that during the Crusades and
Inquisition, people committed terrible deeds in the name of Christ. In our home
country, slavery and Jim Crow all too often was justified in the name of
Christ.”
Our president is doing his best to advance the Leftist
narrative that Christians were behind the slavery and racism of this country's
history. But the truth is, it was Christians
who put their lives and reputations on the line to abolish slavery. Christians were
motivated by Scripture to end slavery and helped runaway slaves get to safety.
Martin Luther King's appeal at it's core was a Christian movement and
Christians of all races were engaged in pressuring our government to pass the
Civil Rights Act.
Scripture is very clear that racism should not characterize
a true follower of Christ. The apostles
had to deal with racial conflict between the Jews and Gentiles in the early
church but they learned God "made no distinction between us and them,
purifying their hearts by faith" (Acts 15:9). God revealed this to the
church through Peter who said, "in truth I perceive that God shows no
partiality" (Acts 10:34 and 1
Peter 1:17). Paul taught that
since God didn’t make distinctions between the races, then neither should we
(Romans 2:11, Ephesians 6:9, and Colossians 3:25). If we are true followers of Christ, we will
obey his command to, "make disciples of all the nations"
regardless of race (Matthew 28:19). All races will be represented in heaven, "out
of every tribe and tongue and people and nation" (Revelation
5:9). Genesis 1:26 tells us that all
people were created in the image of God. “Have we not all one Father? Has
not one God created us? Why do we deal treacherously with one another by
profaning the covenant of the fathers?” (Malachi 2:10).
Regarding the president's
"high horse" in bringing up the Crusades, any research of the true
history beyond the superficial would reveal that the Crusades were a
response to Islamic Jihad spreading into Europe. Historical revisionists like to paint the
Crusades as expansionist imperialism but their purpose were actually intended to discourage
Islamists from expanding into Europe and open Christian holy places again to pilgrimage. Likewise, a serious unbiased investigation
into the Inquisition would reveal that the Catholic Church had virtually
nothing to do with it. It was the secular
authorities who burned the heretics seeing heresy as treason because royal
authority was questioned. These same secular
authorities criticized the church for not taking a more active role in the
Inquisition.
Of course humanists like President Obama don't really care
much about history. They are quick to
dismiss history saying, "the winners get to write the history" which
is just a rationalization to ignore history.
Since today's postmodern humanists believe that history is subject to
interpretation, they set out to change the record of history by advancing a
narrative that makes Christianity out to be a villain. Such historical revisionism is in the spirit
of Antichrist and this is growing in our day; The Antichrist will "intend
to change times and law" (Daniel 7:25).
It is pretty clear to all who watch current events without a
humanist bias that the terrorism going on in the world is due to Islam despite
the media trying to put lipstick on the pig.
Since 9/11/2001, Muslims
have made 41 attacks against non-Muslims in the U.S.
causing 71 deaths and 326 injured. I am not aware of any Muslims being killed
by Christians in this country. Humanists
will say this is evidence that Christianity is just more evolved than Islam, that
we just need to be patient with them until they have their reformation. But this only reveals the continuing
ignorance of history that characterize humanists. The Protestant Reformation wasn't about
repenting of a violent past, it was about returning to biblical authority. Christianity never had a history of pursuing
conversions through violence as Islam practices. Jesus said, "you will know them by
their fruits" (Matthew 7:16); the fruit of Islam is deception, death and
destruction.
As radical humanists like President Obama are allowed to
have more power in this world, there will be more historical revisionism to stir
up the public to turn further from God and His children. Since we are in the season of Christ's return
per the parable of the fig tree (Matthew 24:32-35), we can expect the spirit of
Antichrist to build culminating in the person of the Antichrist coming to
power. I thank God the Church will not
be on earth when the Antichrist reigns.
If you do not know Jesus as your Savior, now is not a good time to be on
the fence.
Well put Scott. We must remember this during the 2016 elections
ReplyDeleteThank you for telling the truth about Christian and Muslim history. We must tell the truth when we have the chance to give those who haven't heard an opportunity to become believers in Christ Jesus.
ReplyDeleteThank you for telling the truth about Christian and Muslim history. We must tell the truth when we have the chance to give those who haven't heard an opportunity to become believers in Christ Jesus.
ReplyDeleteDo you really think there was such a thing as "secular authorities" in medieval Europe? Church-state separation had not yet been invented, and theocracy ruled the day. You seem to have an idealized view of history, applying modern (and dare I say, progressive) concepts such as secularism to an era where there was no such thing. The authorities committing atrocities in those days believed in their god. Seems to me, the best you can argue is, "well, they were not true Christians." But the same argument can be, and is being, applied to current events by Muslim apologists. Who is a unbiased observer to believe? It seems like a "my religion is better than your religion" pissing contest from my standpoint.
ReplyDeleteYou are correct that theocracy ruled the day in Europe, that is why we have a First Amendment to the Constitution in the USA. The royals had co-opted the power the Church had over people to bolster their own. You are also correct in the observation that those who perpetrated atrocities in the name of Christ were not true Christians. All who truly follow the teachings of Christ would not murder innocents. The same can not be said of Islam. Mohammad not only practiced the murder of innocents himself, his followers are commanded to (see Sura 8:59 and 9:5 in the Quran). True Christians work for peace; true Muslims wage Jihad.
Delete